Monday, January 29, 2007

Another Council Assembly

Last Wednesday saw the first Council Assembly of 2007 - and as I have not posted for over a month it seems appropriate to catch up with events from that evening.

Three deputations raised important issues about services in our community from violent crime to post office closures. Residents from Camberwell came to address Council Assembly about their fears for the increase of violent crime in the area. Camberwell Community Council Chair Ian Wingfield proposed an excellent motion following the deputation which called on the Council to publish its Violent Crime Strategy. Although there appear to be a number of action plans in place there is currently no strategy - and whilst the objects of any strategy may be fairly apparent it is important that residents of Camberwell and the borough generally should be reassured that the Police and Council are working together for a common goal.

Teresa Priest led a deputation of users and supporters from the Maudsley Emergency Clinic. The South London and Maudsley NHS Trust have taken the decision to close the clinic which provides a 24 hour emergency service for those suffering from mental health crises and has proposed that they receive treatment at the Kings College Hospital A & E department. The decision has been endorsed by the Health Secretary Patricia Hewitt. It was quite apparent from the deputation that the service provided by the Clinic is unique and provides a real life-line to its users. There has been widespread cross-party support for the campaign to keep the Clinic with all local MPs and Councillors backing Teresa and her team. Cllr David Noakes worked hard to preserve this cross-party support and his motion received unanimous support.

As I said during the course of the debate, it makes me angry that at a time when there is record investment going into the health service the only headlines which we seem to read about concern department closures and staff redundancies. I hope that the Government has got its priorities right, because when a Clinic such as the the the Maudsley's emergency department is forced to close alarm bells must start ringing.

The meeting gave rise to two examples of absolute hypocrisy from the Conservatives, and particularly veteran councillor Toby Eckersley, who has been put in charge of the Council's finances under the unpopular Tory/LibDem coalition. For years Toby has argued that the Council should work harder to improve its council tax collection rate, and in 2004 proposed that it should rise to 97.5% - a level it has remained at since. The anticipated collection rate determines the amount of money the council budgets for in the forthcoming financial year. So what an amazing turnaround that on Wednesday Toby should be proposing a cut in that collection rate to 96% - effectively condoning the failures of Southwark to collect its council tax. A Labour amendment to maintain the rate at 97.5% was defeated.

But perhaps the biggest hypocrisy of the evening, and perhaps the most shameful vote, concerned changes to the Council's constitution to vary the management structure. Last October announcements were made which effectively deleted the role of Strategic Director of Housing Management. The announcements were poorly handled and the whole restructuring had the impression of being drawn up on a post-it note. Permanent measures became interim, and consultation which had originally been deemed unnecessary was suddenly found to be required good practice! In fact, the changes required amendments to the Constitution, with the Constitution providing that all changes having to be considered first by the Council's Standards Committee. Amazingly although the Standards Committee had not met to consider these changes the proposals were brought to Council Assembly. Shame-faced officers and Executive members sat silently as their unconstitutional proposals were introduced, but proceeded to vote them through nevertheless. Cllr Eckersley has always been a supporter of the rights of backbench councillors and the importance of the constitution, but he was amazingly silent on this subject. Isn't it curious how hypocritical politicians become when they hold Executive office!

Cllr Richard Thomas made the telling comment after the vote that now the Council could get on with delivering services for its residents. Well said Richard, but it is equally important that the democratic process is followed - otherwise why should we bother with elections at all?! It is no good for council officers simply to do whatever they want with no regard to the political impact of their actions - or for politicians to let those officers get away with it.


TommyD said...

I find it hypocritical for you to talk about crime and disorder and the failings of politicians.

How many times have residents on and around Southampton Way spoken before you at Community Council? How many signatures have accompanied pleas for helps? How many letters, emails and pieces of paper have been sent to you personally regarding the degeneration of the area and awaiting powder keg? Answers: it gets well into the hundreds all total.

How many times have you personally spoken up in said meetings? How many replies to our countless communications have you personally made? Answer? None. Not one.

So when you discuss violent crime and someone points out the recent two tragic murders on and just off Southampton Way, whatever blame you case to other parties, remember, you were warned repeatedly about the situation. And you personally have never spoken up or out on our particular issues.

Hypocrisy by politicians on violent crime seems to cut across all parties.

Peter John said...

I know that you and other residents of Southampton Way have been rightly concerned about the rise in crime in your area, but your comments are off-target. I think that just looking back through my blog - which has been concerned primarily with South Camberwell - you will see that crime and disorder is a subject which I have spoken out about on many occasions.

Labour's election campaign last year concentrated heavily on crime in the borough - and we were criticised by our opponents for that fact. Following the fatal shooting in Camberwell Green last November I was also a signatory to a letter from all Camberwell Councillors calling for urgent action to tackle the problem of violent crime in Camberwell.

And I have certainly replied to e-mails from campaigners in Southampton Way - perhaps you should get in touch with them to confirm that?

But I do really share your concerns - the events of the past week have been horrific. Whatever lies behind these various murders I think we need to keep reminding young people that life is precious and that this sort of mindless violent murder is not a sign of strength - but stupidity and weakness.